Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so the protection means wasting resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Nowhere in the world has the issue of wild animals been so much debated as in our society. Nowadays, the habitat of wild animals is being destroyed, but many people think that it to be insignificant to protect these wild animals. The above point is absolutely wrong, this essay will outline three reasons. The main reason is that people should not master existent right of animals. Not only people but also wild animals have the right to live. More and more wild animals are rapidly disappearing from this globe, it couldn't be divided with that natural environment was destroyed. It is unfair to wild animals whose existent rights are being ignored. Another reason is that biologic diversity should be protected. In the future, it will be terrible and alone definitely if only people survive on this globe. Also, the variety of species has an important scientific value. For instance, invention of radar was based on ultrasonic of bat. Last but not the least reason is many wild animals are not protected, it means the natural balance will be broken, people will face challenges and problems. People destroyed environment of nature, resulting a smaller in habitat for wild animals. Also, the problems of environment have already affected oneself of people. If people couldn't amend current status, it will be the biggest bale of them. In conclusion, people ought to pay out plenty of money for improving existent environment of wild animals. This behavior doesn't have the meaning of alms. On the contrary, it just means atonement. 本文来源：https://www.wddqw.com/doc/57416743aa8271fe910ef12d2af90242a895ab26.html