【#新概念英语# 导语】新概念一共144课,其中单课为课文,双课为语法和练习。整本书是以单数课为正课,并附带有插图而双数课则是针对单数课所讲的内容有针对性地进行练习,展现出整个新概念一教材区别于其他教材的独特之处。©文档大全网为您整理了以下内容,仅供参考。希望可以帮助到您!如果您想要了解更多相关内容,欢迎关注©文档大全网!
【篇一】研究发现 爱露事业线的女人更有气魄
A new study has shown that women who show more cleavage in the workplace are seen better bosses and appear more powerful.
By contrast, bosses who buttoned up were perceived as less powerful and mature - undermining their influence on staff.
The study, published in the Journal of Social Psychology, found women who loosened their top few buttons were seen as more forceful - especially to female colleagues.
The outcome actually surprised researchers at the University of Wisconsin, who had expected a camisole to boost a woman's image.
'In fact, not wearing a camisole under blouses made women appear more powerful,' researchers said. 'These findings highlight the complexity of the messages shown by clothing.'
'It's clear that dressing provocatively can have negative consequences. But our findings suggest the right combination of clothing can also project power.'
The study showed 170 women and 29 men various pictures of women and asked they rate them in terms of competence and leadership.
The women who were revealed cleavage and who had five or six undone blouse buttons were seen as the most powerful and forceful.
【篇二】译文
一项最新研究表明,在职场露出更多事业线的女性往往被认为是更好的老板、且显得更强大。
相比之下,那些保守的老板则被认为不够强大、不够成熟--削弱了她们对员工的影响力。
这项研究被刊载在《社会心理学》期刊之上,发现女性松开上衣几个扣子会被认为更有气魄--尤其是对女性同事来说。
这一结果事实上让威斯康星大学的研究人员们非常惊讶,他们最先认为女性在衬衣里穿打底衫可以提升自己的形象。
研究人员们表示:“事实上,衬衣里不穿打底衫会显得女性更有魄力。这些发现突出了服装所展示信息的复杂性。”
“很明显,穿着太过刺激会产生消极的后果。但是我们的结果表明,正确的服装搭配也能产生助力。”
该研究给170名女性和29名男性展示了各种女性的照片,随后要求他们根据能力和领导力评价照片中的人。
那些露出事业线、或者有五六个衬衣扣子没扣的女性被认为大、最坚强。
【篇三】美国航天局提供高薪职业,但需长“出差“
If you're keen to earn a bit of extra cash while potentially saving this planet from alien infection, NASA has an opening for you.
The US space agency is looking to hire a Planetary Protection Officer who will both protect our planet from the Martians and make sure that humans venturing into space do not contaminate other worlds.
The job requires "frequent travel" but it does come with a salary of $187,000 (£141,000) a year with benefits, which isn't bad.
"Planetary protection is concerned with the avoidance of organic-constituent and biological contamination in human and robotic space exploration," reads the job description.
“Nasa maintains policies for planetary protection applicable to all space flight missions that may intentionally or unintentionally carry Earth organisms and organic constituents to the planets or other solar system bodies, and any mission employing spacecraft, which are intended to return to Earth with samples from extraterrestrial targets of exploration.”
The role will probably require involvement in NASA's upcoming missions, including a planned trip to Jupiter's moon Europa in the 2020s.
If you're interested in applying, NASA says you need at least one year's experience as a civilian government employee and an advanced degree in physical science, engineering or mathematics.
The space agency says the role requires “demonstrated skills in diplomacy that resulted in win-win solutions during extremely difficult and complex multilateral discussions”.
You also need to have "advanced knowledge" of planetary protection, which probably means more than just having read The Andromeda Strain whilst on holiday.
【篇四】译文
如果你热衷于赚点外快,同时有保护地球免受外星生物感染的潜能,那美国航空航天局可以为你提供一份工作。
美国宇航局希望聘请一名行星保护官,他既要保护我们的行星免受火星生物的侵袭,又要确保人类进入太空时不会污染其他世界。
这份工作需要“经常出差”,但其薪资还不错,算上福利,年收入可达187,000美元(141000英镑)。
“行星保护涉及的是在人类和机器人进行太空探索的时候免受有机组分和生物性侵染,”该工作简介上写道。
“对于所有有意或无意中携带地球生物或有机成分到行星或太阳系其他星球上的太空航行任务,或是任何携带地球外探索目标的样品返回地球的航天任务,美国航空航天局会坚守那些适用于上述所有航天任务的行星保护政策。”
这份工作可能还需要参与美国航空航天局即将执行的任务,其中包括在2020年去木星的卫星欧罗巴的一次计划中的行程。
美国航空航天局表示,如果你对这份工作感兴趣,你至少需要有一年在政府部门担任文职工作的经验,并且要有自然科学、工程学或数学领域的高学历。
宇航局称,这个角色需要“善于处理人际关系,可以在特别困难复杂的多边商讨中找到一种双赢的解决方案。”
你还需要了解关于行星保护的“先进知识”,这可能意味着在你休假的时候,你要做的不仅仅是读完《安德罗美达菌株》这本书。
职场新概念英语(45).doc正在阅读:
职场新概念英语(45)06-10
2021年下半年陕西中级银行从业资格报名时间:预计8月开始07-27
高一满分作文:无奈的思考03-16
那件事让我很心伤作文700字11-19
2018派出所实习报告范文大全09-09
美国投资移民的面试技巧06-21
重庆九龙坡2020年8月自学考试成绩查询:8月24日公布11-06
高一生物需回归课本重基础04-22