对气候变化及代际正义的哲学思考 董鹏;贾联哲 【期刊名称】《延安大学学报（社会科学版）》 【年(卷),期】2015(000)002 【摘 要】Previously,in order to make international climate controversies defused,most advanced countries claimed carbon emission limitation and trading system should be taken at most international mainstream climate change summits. However,international carbon emission limitation and trading system canˊt scientifically evaluate carbon emission demands and controlling abilities of different countries. And most developing countries,including China,will have to spend millions of money to purchase the authority of carbon emission. In this case,intergenera-tional Justice theory seems to be a good way to endure fairness to the distribution of carbon emission rights. But there still exists some one-sidedness on intergenerational Justice,for intergenerational Justice neglects the improve-ments of modern technology and social awareness. And some parts of the intergenerational Justice theory still remain at plane-dimension thinking. At present,developing countries and developed countries should make improvements based on the common value,and despite mutual differences and contradictions,we can step out the impasse of global climate negotiation and governance.%为了解决国际气候争端问题，欧美等主要发达国家在其倡导的气候论坛及峰会上主张采用国际限额与交易制度。一方面，国际限额与交易制度难以全面评估和衡量不同国家碳的排放量及其减少排放的能力，正处于现代化进程中的中国据此将需要购买排放权，而代际正义有利于还原碳排放指标分配的公允。另一方面，在代际正义理论的背后，却存在明显的片面性，因为它忽略了现代科技不断进步的可能和社会价值意识水平的提高，其理论仅停留在平面维度上的思考。当前，发展中国家和发达国家应在差异中趋于协同，在看似矛盾冲突的气候谈判与整治格局中逐渐走出僵局。 【总页数】5页(P33-37) 【作 者】董鹏;贾联哲 【作者单位】卡斯塔集团 计划部，广东 梅州 514759;吉林大学 马克思主义学院，吉林 长春 130012 【正文语种】中 文 【中图分类】B82 【相关文献】 1.论程序正义与现代法律文明——一种基于程序正义理念的法哲学思考2.对罗尔斯代际正义论的审查--兼论实现代际正义的最佳途径3.正义原则与国际合作应对气候变化的激励机制——从法哲学与经济学的交叉视角4.对气候变化危机及代际正义问题的哲学思考5.代际正义的可能性与现实性——罗尔斯代际正义理论探析 因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买 本文来源：https://www.wddqw.com/doc/3e587d6115fc700abb68a98271fe910ef12dae97.html