介于科学和哲学之间的科学哲学--基于对波普尔和费耶阿本德的思想比较 张涛 【期刊名称】《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》 【年(卷),期】2015(000)002 【摘 要】波普尔与费耶阿本德均是科学哲学的代表人物，但经过哲学社会学的考察发现，这两位学者均不是专业的科学家。波普尔在讨论科学划界时所关注的“科学”更接近于人文社会科学，他所坚持的“猜想与反驳”的严格演绎逻辑其实是“普遍怀疑”的变种，因此他更多是从哲学的角度来看待科学。波普尔的严格证伪主义是缺乏内容和历史性的，费耶阿本德则把波普尔的这种逻辑推向极致，得出了怎么都行的方法论。通过梳理发现，两者所持有的社会态度和政治立场对他们的思想都产生了根本性的影响。通过对两者思想的比较，可以发现科学哲学中所存在的科学倾向和哲学倾向，这种结论迫使科学哲学重新反思自身的适用范围、目的和意义。%Karl R. Popper and Paul Feyerabend are both important scholars in the history of philosophy of science. After the inspection of their knowledge backgrounds in the view of philosophical sociology, it is found that neither of them are professional scientists. The science that Popper concerns in the discussion of the demarcation of science is much similar to humanity and social science. Strict deductive logic of"conjecture and refutations"that he adhered to is actually a"general suspicion"variant, and therefore his idea is more of a philosophical perspective on science. Popper's falsificationism lacks rigorous content and historic;while Feyerabend put this logic to the extreme and obtained a"whatever"methodology. Discussion has found that both their social attitudes and political positions had a fundamental impact on their ideas. Comparison of their respective ideas has revealed that in the philosophy of science there are scientific and philosophic tendencies, which forces the philosophy of science to rethink its scope, purpose and meaning. 【总页数】4页(P78-81) 【作 者】张涛 【作者单位】北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院，北京100875 【正文语种】中 文 【中图分类】B5 【相关文献】 1.西方科学哲学的文本研究与思想创新--读《科学、批判与自由-费耶阿本德有限理性论研究》 [J], 王学静 2.理解科学：从哲学辩护到文化批判—简评《从科学哲学走向文化哲学-库恩与费耶阿本德思想的后现代转型》 [J], 史洪飞;解西伟 3.浅析费耶阿本德的科学哲学 [J], 刘震 4.费耶阿本德的科学哲学思想解读 [J], 谢玮璐 5.费耶阿本德哲学的新探索——评《科学、批判与自由——费耶阿本德有限理性论研究》 [J], 匡瑾璘 因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买 本文来源：https://www.wddqw.com/doc/d2fc7700f4ec4afe04a1b0717fd5360cba1a8dd4.html